السمع والأبصار والأفئدة

مشكلة جمع الأبصار وإفراد السمع

فرض حل 2

عدد أعصاب السمع 30,000 عصب
بينما البصر ما يزيد على 1,000,000 عصب
هل من الممكن وجود قابلية للمرونة في الإستقبال الحسي للبصر عن السمع؟؟
بمعنى أن القشرة المخية المسؤلة عن البصر لها تمثيل أفضل من مثيلتها في السمع, فهل ممكن أن يكون نتيجة لذلك إمكانية تشكل القشرة على حسب ما تم التعرض له من البيئة الخارجية أو بطريقة أخرى مثلا عندما يولد طفل وتهيء له فرصة أن يرى لون معين مثلا أكثر من غيره فيكون نتيجة لذلك استيعابه ووعيه بهذا اللون مختلف عن أقرانه ممن لا يعرضون لمثل هذا؟ وكذلك ينطبق أيضا على سائر أنواع الإستقبال البصري من عمق وحركة وتباين وشدة إضاءة إلخ.
على عكس السمع الذي كل وظيفته هي التمثيل العصبي لمدى معين من الموجات الصوتية يتراوح بين 20 و 20,000 هرتز.
هذا يحتاج إلى تجارب عملية , وأنا في هذه اللحظة لا أملك أي وسائل وربما أي قدرة أيضا...أسأل الله العون

فرض حل 3

أحيانا يعبر عن الخبرة البصرية ب(الإسكتش البصري) حيث أي شيء وعلى أي صورة كأنه يرسم فلا يوجد وحدة تنبني عليها الصور ولا حتى شبيهة بال(بكسل) وهو النظام المتبع لرسم الصور رقميا
هذا يرجع إلى الطبيعة العبقرية المبني عليها نظام الإستقبال البصري, فالبصر لا تبنى صورته كمثل بناء الصورة بالكاميرا مثلا مجد نسخ لما هو متاح, ولكن النظام البصري مصمم لستقبل التباين وهذا يتيح وسيلة أفضل للتعامل مع النماذج (الجيشتالت) فكل نموذج مهما كان يتم رسمه بتلك الطريقة
على عكس السمع فهو أضيق من أن يسع كل هذا




تذييل:
لو فرض صحة الإفتراض القائل بأن لكل واحد بصره وفؤاده وسمع عام..فمن الممكن أن يكةن هذا هو سبب تقديم السمع على غيره بسبب عموميته بين الأفراد.

الوعي

ملحوظة:هذه التدوينة وتقريبا جميع التدوينات هنا ليست تعليمية ولكن افتراضات وخواطر هذا لعدم التضليل


تعريف:الوعي احساس مصاحب للحالة الحيوية الوظيفية التفاعلية للمخ

حالة الوعي هو ليس الذي تشعر به تجاه نفسك كواع ولكن ما تلاحظه من وعي غيرك وهناك فرق.
بعض العلماء يرجع سبب ما عليه الإنسان من ثقافة إلى تطور في المخ سمح بفهم الاخرين كعناصر فاعلة قصدية مثلها في ذلك مثل الذات, الفرق بين أن تأكل وأن ترى غيرك يأكل هو الفرق بين انطباعك عن الوعى عن نفسك وعن غيرك..بمعنى أنت ترى غيرك متيقظ متفاعل مستجيب وفقط هذا هو ما عليه معنى الوعي لا ما يصاحبه من حالة وجدانية التي تصاحب إحساس كل فرد منا .
مشكلة معظم من يفكرون بالوعي شيئان:
1-أنه لا يتعامل مع الكائن(الإنسان مثلا)- وتحديدا جهازه العصبي- على أنه جهاز تفاعل مع البيئة الخارجية كجوهر أساسي للوظيفة وربما وحيد أو باختصار لا يجرد ذاك المعنى بشكل كاف.
2-أنه لا يفرق بين الحالتين المذكورتين سابقا(الوعي تجاه نفسه وتجاه غيره)

هذا بالإضافة إالى الإختلاف على مشكلة تعريف الوعي كمصطلح لغوي "الحالة التي أنت عليها من يقظة أو الإحساس أو فهم واستيعاب هذا الإحساس وربما غير ذك"

فرض لحل الإشكال:
ليس مهم الإتفاق جميعا على معنى واحد وفلسفة وحيدة للوعي نظرا لإختلاف المنظور الإصطلاحي ومشكلة كل منا مع الوعي ولكن المهم هو حل المشكلة بغض النظر عن عمومية أو خصوصية هذا الحل.
كنت أرجع مشكلة عدم استيعابي واستيعاب المهتمون بالعلوم العصبية إالى أن المعلومات الحالية غير كافية لفهم الوعي ولكن أعتقد الان أن المسألة مسألة تجريد.
الخلية البكتيرية هي كائن حي..خلية واحدة مختزل فيها جميع الأجهزة الحيوية الموجودة لدى كائن مثل الإنسان,
الخلية البكتيرية تتفاعل مع بيئتها الخارجية أيضا من خلال هذه الخلية الوحيدة تماما مثل الجهاز العصبي بغض النظر عن المدخلات
والمخرجات.
ييساطة وفقا لما ترى به مشكلة الوعي: إن كنت تعتبر أن لهذه الخلية نوع من الوعي فأنت لديك تماما نفس النوع من الوعي وإن لم تعتبر ذلك فأنت ممن ينفون الوجود الحقيقي لشيء كالوعي.
التفسير:
أنت تتفاعل مع بيئتك الخارجية بواسطة جهازك العصبي على عكس البكتيريا الأقل تطورا,
الجهاز العصبي كي يقوم بوظيفته يتلقى المعلومات من البيئة ويتعامل معها بشكل ما لينتج مخرجات تهييء الكائن لوضع حيوي أفضل في ظل تغيرات البيئة الخارجية, هذه المخرجات قد تكون حركية وهذه أبسط صورة لدائرة معلومات داخل الجهاز العصبي

مع تطور الجهاز العصبي أضحى هذا الجهاز يتعامل مع المدخلات بنوع من التصنيف والتخزين مما أتاح للكائن تفاعل أكثر تركيبا وتعقيدا مع المدخلات, هذه التصنيفات هي ما يصطلح عليه بالمشاعر أو العواطف فأصبحت دائرة المعلومات كالاتي:
مدخلات تصنف إلى مصنف ما, ثم تلك المصنفات تتداخل فيما بينها ليطغى أكثرها أهمية على المخرجات التى أصبحت تسمى سلوك
ما يمتاز به الإنسان هو تصنيف كبير جدا كبر من أقرب الكائنات إليه.
أحد مصنفات الإنسان(مشاعر وعواطف) وطرق تداخلها هو التفكير و بؤرة الوعي
احساسك بنفسك هو شعور يتطلبه الجهاز العصبي لاداء أفضل للكائن في البيئة
فالترتيب التدريجي التطوري للمخ كالاتي

1 -مدخلات تتفاعل ليطغى مدخل ليثير مخرج مباشرة وهذا موجود في أبسط الأجهزة العصبية وموجود أيضا في ما يليها تطورا
2-مدخلات تخزن تصنيفيا ويتم تفاعل المصنفات ليطغى أحدهاليولد الإخراج وهذا هو الجهاز الأرقى عن سابقه وهو الموجود بالثدييات القديمة وربما الجديدة تبا لتصنيف "مكلين" للأدمغة.
3-مدخلات تخزن تصنيفيا ثم تمرير المصنفات الداخلة على جهاز ما يفاضل بين المصنفات على أساس غير عشوائي ليتم اختيار أحدها ليتحكم بالإخراج وهذا هو مخ الإنسان

نرجع للمشكلة الأصلية من المناظرة مع البكتيريا
دائرة معلومات البكتيريا صغيرة جدا وتقوم بها خلية وحيدة وحتى ليست منقطعة لتلك الوظيفة فقط, أما كائن كالإنسان فهناك بلايين الخلايا تقوم بنفس تلك الوظيفة ولنفس الأهداف تماما(الأهداف هي ما نصطلح عليه بالغرائز وهي إجمالا غريزة حفظ الذات أو النفس وغريزة حفظ النوع أو الجنس وكلا الكائنين لهما نفس الوظيفة تماما)
إذن كل ما زاد على الأمر وسيلة ما(تصنيف معقد للمدخلات) هو ما يجعلنا "نشعر" بالوعي
فالنتيجة:
إن كنت ترى أن الوعي هو التفاعل فكلانا (الإنسان والبكتيريا) لهما نفس الشيء وفي هذه الحالة الوعي له وجود اصيل
وإن كنت ترى أنه الحالة الوجدانية فهو مجرد مدخل مصنف ما صنف هكذا إلا لاداء أفضل وهو في هذه الحالة لا وجود أصيل له وما تشعر به من وعيك لا وجود حقيقي له.
هذا الشعور لا يتواجد على المستوى الوضعي لهذه الفكرة عند البكتيريا إذ لا جهاز عصبي لها مثيل لذاك المتواجد لدى الإنسان.
ولكن القصة لا تنتهي هنا

تعميم فلسفي:
يتبع

الاّيات

اّيات الحواس(المدخلات)



خَتَمَ اللّهُ عَلَى قُلُوبِهمْ وَعَلَى سَمْعِهِمْ وَعَلَى أَبْصَارِهِمْ غِشَاوَةٌ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ عظِيمٌ [البقرة : 7]
َولَوْ شَاء اللّهُ لَذَهَبَ بِسَمْعِهِمْ وَأَبْصَارِهِمْ إِنَّ اللَّه عَلَى كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ [البقرة : 20]
َومَثَلُ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ كَمَثَلِ الَّذِي يَنْعِقُ بِمَا لاَ يَسْمَعُ إِلاَّ دُعَاء وَنِدَاء صُمٌّ بُكْمٌ عُمْيٌ فَهُمْ لاَ يَعْقِلُونَ [البقرة : 171]
إِنَّمَا يَسْتَجِيبُ الَّذِينَ يَسْمَعُونَ وَالْمَوْتَى يَبْعَثُهُمُ اللّهُ ثُمَّ إِلَيْهِ يُرْجَعُونَ [الأنعام : 36]
ُقُلْ أَرَأَيْتُمْ إِنْ أَخَذَ اللّهُ سَمْعَكُمْ وَأَبْصَارَكُمْ وَخَتَمَ عَلَى قُلُوبِكُم مَّنْ إِلَـهٌ غَيْرُ اللّهِ يَأْتِيكُم بِهِ انظُرْ كَيْفَ نُصَرِّفُ الآيَاتِ ثُمَّ هُمْ يَصْدِفُونَ [الأنعام : 46]
َأَوَلَمْ يَهْدِ لِلَّذِينَ يَرِثُونَ الأَرْضَ مِن بَعْدِ أَهْلِهَا أَن لَّوْ نَشَاء أَصَبْنَاهُم بِذُنُوبِهِمْ وَنَطْبَعُ عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ فَهُمْ لاَ يَسْمَعُونَ [الأعراف : 100]
وَلَقَدْ ذَرَأْنَا لِجَهَنَّمَ كَثِيراً مِّنَ الْجِنِّ وَالإِنسِ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌ لاَّ يَفْقَهُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ أَعْيُنٌ لاَّ يُبْصِرُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ آذَانٌ لاَّ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا أُوْلَـئِكَ كَالأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ أُوْلَـئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُونَ [الأعراف : 179]
َألَهُمْ أَرْجُلٌ يَمْشُونَ بِهَا أَمْ لَهُمْ أَيْدٍ يَبْطِشُونَ بِهَا أَمْ لَهُمْ أَعْيُنٌ يُبْصِرُونَ بِهَا أَمْ لَهُمْ آذَانٌ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا قُلِ ادْعُواْ شُرَكَاءكُمْ ثُمَّ كِيدُونِ فَلاَ تُنظِرُونِ [الأعراف : 195]
وَإِن تَدْعُوهُمْ إِلَى الْهُدَى لاَ يَسْمَعُواْ وَتَرَاهُمْ يَنظُرُونَ إِلَيْكَ وَهُمْ لاَ يُبْصِرُونَ [الأعراف : 198]
وَلَوْ عَلِمَ اللّهُ فِيهِمْ خَيْراً لَّأسْمَعَهُمْ وَلَوْ أَسْمَعَهُمْ لَتَوَلَّواْ وَّهُم مُّعْرِضُونَ [الأنفال : 23]
وَإِذَا تُتْلَى عَلَيْهِمْ آيَاتُنَا قَالُواْ قَدْ سَمِعْنَا لَوْ نَشَاء لَقُلْنَا مِثْلَ هَـذَا إِنْ هَـذَا إِلاَّ أَسَاطِيرُ الأوَّلِينَ [الأنفال : 31]
قُلْ مَن يَرْزُقُكُم مِّنَ السَّمَاءِ وَالأَرْضِ أَمَّن يَمْلِكُ السَّمْعَ والأَبْصَارَ وَمَن يُخْرِجُ الْحَيَّ مِنَ الْمَيِّتِ وَيُخْرِجُ الْمَيَّتَ مِنَ الْحَيِّ وَمَن يُدَبِّرُ الأَمْرَ فَسَيَقُولُونَ اللّهُ فَقُلْ أَفَلاَ تَتَّقُونَ [يونس : 31]
وَمِنْهُم مَّن يَسْتَمِعُونَ إِلَيْكَ أَفَأَنتَ تُسْمِعُ الصُّمَّ وَلَوْ كَانُواْ لاَ يَعْقِلُونَ [يونس : 42]
هُوَ الَّذِي جَعَلَ لَكُمُ اللَّيْلَ لِتَسْكُنُواْ فِيهِ وَالنَّهَارَ مُبْصِراً إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لآيَاتٍ لِّقَوْمٍ يَسْمَعُونَ [يونس : 67]
أُولَـئِكَ لَمْ يَكُونُواْ مُعْجِزِينَ فِي الأَرْضِ وَمَا كَانَ لَهُم مِّن دُونِ اللّهِ مِنْ أَوْلِيَاء يُضَاعَفُ لَهُمُ الْعَذَابُ مَا كَانُواْ يَسْتَطِيعُونَ السَّمْعَ وَمَا كَانُواْ يُبْصِرُونَ [هود : 20]
وَاللّهُ أَخْرَجَكُم مِّن بُطُونِ أُمَّهَاتِكُمْ لاَ تَعْلَمُونَ شَيْئاً وَجَعَلَ لَكُمُ الْسَّمْعَ وَالأَبْصَارَ وَالأَفْئِدَةَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَشْكُرُونَ [النحل : 78]
أُولَـئِكَ الَّذِينَ طَبَعَ اللّهُ عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ وَسَمْعِهِمْ وَأَبْصَارِهِمْ وَأُولَـئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُونَ [النحل : 108]
وَلاَ تَقْفُ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ إِنَّ السَّمْعَ وَالْبَصَرَ وَالْفُؤَادَ كُلُّ أُولـئِكَ كَانَ عَنْهُ مَسْؤُولاً [الإسراء : 36]
قُلِ اللَّهُ أَعْلَمُ بِمَا لَبِثُوا لَهُ غَيْبُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ أَبْصِرْ بِهِ وَأَسْمِعْ مَا لَهُم مِّن دُونِهِ مِن وَلِيٍّ وَلَا يُشْرِكُ فِي حُكْمِهِ أَحَداً [الكهف : 26]
الَّذِينَ كَانَتْ أَعْيُنُهُمْ فِي غِطَاء عَن ذِكْرِي وَكَانُوا لَا يَسْتَطِيعُونَ سَمْعاً [الكهف : 101]
أَسْمِعْ بِهِمْ وَأَبْصِرْ يَوْمَ يَأْتُونَنَا لَكِنِ الظَّالِمُونَ الْيَوْمَ فِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ [مريم : 38]
إِذْ قَالَ لِأَبِيهِ يَا أَبَتِ لِمَ تَعْبُدُ مَا لَا يَسْمَعُ وَلَا يُبْصِرُ وَلَا يُغْنِي عَنكَ شَيْئاً [مريم : 42]
لَا يَسْمَعُونَ فِيهَا لَغْواً إِلَّا سَلَاماً وَلَهُمْ رِزْقُهُمْ فِيهَا بُكْرَةً وَعَشِيّاً [مريم : 62]
وَكَمْ أَهْلَكْنَا قَبْلَهُم مِّن قَرْنٍ هَلْ تُحِسُّ مِنْهُم مِّنْ أَحَدٍ أَوْ تَسْمَعُ لَهُمْ رِكْزاً [مريم : 98]
قُلْ إِنَّمَا أُنذِرُكُم بِالْوَحْيِ وَلَا يَسْمَعُ الصُّمُّ الدُّعَاء إِذَا مَا يُنذَرُونَ [الأنبياء : 45]
لَهُمْ فِيهَا زَفِيرٌ وَهُمْ فِيهَا لَا يَسْمَعُونَ [الأنبياء : 100]
أَفَلَمْ يَسِيرُوا فِي الْأَرْضِ فَتَكُونَ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌ يَعْقِلُونَ بِهَا أَوْ آذَانٌ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا فَإِنَّهَا لَا تَعْمَى الْأَبْصَارُ وَلَكِن تَعْمَى الْقُلُوبُ الَّتِي فِي الصُّدُورِ [الحج : 46]
وَهُوَ الَّذِي أَنشَأَ لَكُمُ السَّمْعَ وَالْأَبْصَارَ وَالْأَفْئِدَةَ قَلِيلاً مَّا تَشْكُرُونَ [المؤمنون : 78]
أَمْ تَحْسَبُ أَنَّ أَكْثَرَهُمْ يَسْمَعُونَ أَوْ يَعْقِلُونَ إِنْ هُمْ إِلَّا كَالْأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ سَبِيلاً [الفرقان : 44]
يُلْقُونَ السَّمْعَ وَأَكْثَرُهُمْ كَاذِبُونَ [الشعراء : 223]
إِنَّكَ لَا تُسْمِعُ الْمَوْتَى وَلَا تُسْمِعُ الصُّمَّ الدُّعَاء إِذَا وَلَّوْا مُدْبِرِينَ [النمل : 80]
وَمَا أَنتَ بِهَادِي الْعُمْيِ عَن ضَلَالَتِهِمْ إِن تُسْمِعُ إِلَّا مَن يُؤْمِنُ بِآيَاتِنَا فَهُم مُّسْلِمُونَ [النمل : 81]
قُلْ أَرَأَيْتُمْ إِن جَعَلَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْكُمُ اللَّيْلَ سَرْمَداً إِلَى يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ مَنْ إِلَهٌ غَيْرُ اللَّهِ يَأْتِيكُم بِضِيَاء أَفَلَا تَسْمَعُونَ [القصص : 71]
وَمِنْ آيَاتِهِ مَنَامُكُم بِاللَّيْلِ وَالنَّهَارِ وَابْتِغَاؤُكُم مِّن فَضْلِهِ إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لَآيَاتٍ لِّقَوْمٍ يَسْمَعُونَ [الروم : 23]
فَإِنَّكَ لَا تُسْمِعُ الْمَوْتَى وَلَا تُسْمِعُ الصُّمَّ الدُّعَاء إِذَا وَلَّوْا مُدْبِرِينَ [الروم : 52]
وَمَا أَنتَ بِهَادِي الْعُمْيِ عَن ضَلَالَتِهِمْ إِن تُسْمِعُ إِلَّا مَن يُؤْمِنُ بِآيَاتِنَا فَهُم مُّسْلِمُونَ [الروم : 53]
وَإِذَا تُتْلَى عَلَيْهِ آيَاتُنَا وَلَّى مُسْتَكْبِراً كَأَن لَّمْ يَسْمَعْهَا كَأَنَّ فِي أُذُنَيْهِ وَقْراً فَبَشِّرْهُ بِعَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ [لقمان : 7]
ثُمَّ سَوَّاهُ وَنَفَخَ فِيهِ مِن رُّوحِهِ وَجَعَلَ لَكُمُ السَّمْعَ وَالْأَبْصَارَ وَالْأَفْئِدَةَ قَلِيلاً مَّا تَشْكُرُونَ [السجدة : 9]
وَلَوْ تَرَى إِذِ الْمُجْرِمُونَ نَاكِسُو رُؤُوسِهِمْ عِندَ رَبِّهِمْ رَبَّنَا أَبْصَرْنَا وَسَمِعْنَا فَارْجِعْنَا نَعْمَلْ صَالِحاً إِنَّا مُوقِنُونَ [السجدة : 12]
إِن تَدْعُوهُمْ لَا يَسْمَعُوا دُعَاءكُمْ وَلَوْ سَمِعُوا مَا اسْتَجَابُوا لَكُمْ وَيَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ يَكْفُرُونَ بِشِرْكِكُمْ وَلَا يُنَبِّئُكَ مِثْلُ خَبِيرٍ [فاطر : 14]
وَمَا يَسْتَوِي الْأَحْيَاء وَلَا الْأَمْوَاتُ إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُسْمِعُ مَن يَشَاءُ وَمَا أَنتَ بِمُسْمِعٍ مَّن فِي الْقُبُورِ [فاطر : 22]
بَشِيراً وَنَذِيراً فَأَعْرَضَ أَكْثَرُهُمْ فَهُمْ لَا يَسْمَعُونَ [فصلت : 4]
حَتَّى إِذَا مَا جَاؤُوهَا شَهِدَ عَلَيْهِمْ سَمْعُهُمْ وَأَبْصَارُهُمْ وَجُلُودُهُمْ بِمَا كَانُوا يَعْمَلُونَ [فصلت : 20]
وَمَا كُنتُمْ تَسْتَتِرُونَ أَنْ يَشْهَدَ عَلَيْكُمْ سَمْعُكُمْ وَلَا أَبْصَارُكُمْ وَلَا جُلُودُكُمْ وَلَكِن ظَنَنتُمْ أَنَّ اللَّهَ لَا يَعْلَمُ كَثِيراً مِّمَّا تَعْمَلُونَ [فصلت : 22]
وَقَالَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا لَا تَسْمَعُوا لِهَذَا الْقُرْآنِ وَالْغَوْا فِيهِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَغْلِبُونَ [فصلت : 26]
أَفَأَنتَ تُسْمِعُ الصُّمَّ أَوْ تَهْدِي الْعُمْيَ وَمَن كَانَ فِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ [الزخرف : 40]
يَسْمَعُ آيَاتِ اللَّهِ تُتْلَى عَلَيْهِ ثُمَّ يُصِرُّ مُسْتَكْبِراً كَأَن لَّمْ يَسْمَعْهَا فَبَشِّرْهُ بِعَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ [الجاثية : 8]
أَفَرَأَيْتَ مَنِ اتَّخَذَ إِلَهَهُ هَوَاهُ وَأَضَلَّهُ اللَّهُ عَلَى عِلْمٍ وَخَتَمَ عَلَى سَمْعِهِ وَقَلْبِهِ وَجَعَلَ عَلَى بَصَرِهِ غِشَاوَةً فَمَن يَهْدِيهِ مِن بَعْدِ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا تَذَكَّرُونَ [الجاثية : 23]
وَلَقَدْ مَكَّنَّاهُمْ فِيمَا إِن مَّكَّنَّاكُمْ فِيهِ وَجَعَلْنَا لَهُمْ سَمْعاً وَأَبْصَاراً وَأَفْئِدَةً فَمَا أَغْنَى عَنْهُمْ سَمْعُهُمْ وَلَا أَبْصَارُهُمْ وَلَا أَفْئِدَتُهُم مِّن شَيْءٍ إِذْ كَانُوا يَجْحَدُونَ بِآيَاتِ اللَّهِ وَحَاقَ بِهِم مَّا كَانُوا بِهِ يَسْتَهْزِئُون [الأحقاف : 26]
إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لَذِكْرَى لِمَن كَانَ لَهُ قَلْبٌ أَوْ أَلْقَى السَّمْعَ وَهُوَ شَهِيدٌ [قـ : 37]
يَوْمَ يَسْمَعُونَ الصَّيْحَةَ بِالْحَقِّ ذَلِكَ يَوْمُ الْخُرُوجِ [قـ : 42]
وَقَالُوا لَوْ كُنَّا نَسْمَعُ أَوْ نَعْقِلُ مَا كُنَّا فِي أَصْحَابِ السَّعِيرِ [الملك : 10]
قُلْ هُوَ الَّذِي أَنشَأَكُمْ وَجَعَلَ لَكُمُ السَّمْعَ وَالْأَبْصَارَ وَالْأَفْئِدَةَ قَلِيلاً مَّا تَشْكُرُونَ [الملك : 23]


اّيات نفي السمع

اّيات ذكر الصمم مع البكم
صُمٌّ بُكْمٌ عُمْيٌ فَهُمْ لاَ يَرْجِعُونَ [البقرة : 18]
وَمَثَلُ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ كَمَثَلِ الَّذِي يَنْعِقُ بِمَا لاَ يَسْمَعُ إِلاَّ دُعَاء وَنِدَاء صُمٌّ بُكْمٌ عُمْيٌ فَهُمْ لاَ يَعْقِلُونَ [البقرة : 171]
وَالَّذِينَ كَذَّبُواْ بِآيَاتِنَا صُمٌّ وَبُكْمٌ فِي الظُّلُمَاتِ مَن يَشَإِ اللّهُ يُضْلِلْهُ وَمَن يَشَأْ يَجْعَلْهُ عَلَى صِرَاطٍ مُّسْتَقِيمٍ [الأنعام : 39]
إِنَّ شَرَّ الدَّوَابِّ عِندَ اللّهِ الصُّمُّ الْبُكْمُ الَّذِينَ لاَ يَعْقِلُونَ [الأنفال : 22]
وَمَن يَهْدِ اللّهُ فَهُوَ الْمُهْتَدِ وَمَن يُضْلِلْ فَلَن تَجِدَ لَهُمْ أَوْلِيَاء مِن دُونِهِ وَنَحْشُرُهُمْ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ عَلَى وُجُوهِهِمْ عُمْياً وَبُكْماً وَصُمّاً مَّأْوَاهُمْ جَهَنَّمُ كُلَّمَا خَبَتْ زِدْنَاهُمْ سَعِيراً [الإسراء : 97]

اّيات ذكر الصمم دون البكم
وَحَسِبُواْ أَلاَّ تَكُونَ فِتْنَةٌ فَعَمُواْ وَصَمُّواْ ثُمَّ تَابَ اللّهُ عَلَيْهِمْ ثُمَّ عَمُواْ وَصَمُّواْ كَثِيرٌ مِّنْهُمْ وَاللّهُ بَصِيرٌ بِمَا يَعْمَلُونَ [المائدة : 71]
وَمِنْهُم مَّن يَسْتَمِعُونَ إِلَيْكَ أَفَأَنتَ تُسْمِعُ الصُّمَّ وَلَوْ كَانُواْ لاَ يَعْقِلُونَ [يونس : 42]
مَثَلُ الْفَرِيقَيْنِ كَالأَعْمَى وَالأَصَمِّ وَالْبَصِيرِ وَالسَّمِيعِ هَلْ يَسْتَوِيَانِ مَثَلاً أَفَلاَ تَذَكَّرُونَ [هود : 24]
قُلْ إِنَّمَا أُنذِرُكُم بِالْوَحْيِ وَلَا يَسْمَعُ الصُّمُّ الدُّعَاء إِذَا مَا يُنذَرُونَ [الأنبياء : 45]
وَالَّذِينَ إِذَا ذُكِّرُوا بِآيَاتِ رَبِّهِمْ لَمْ يَخِرُّوا عَلَيْهَا صُمّاً وَعُمْيَاناً [الفرقان : 73]
إِنَّكَ لَا تُسْمِعُ الْمَوْتَى وَلَا تُسْمِعُ الصُّمَّ الدُّعَاء إِذَا وَلَّوْا مُدْبِرِينَ [النمل : 80]
فَإِنَّكَ لَا تُسْمِعُ الْمَوْتَى وَلَا تُسْمِعُ الصُّمَّ الدُّعَاء إِذَا وَلَّوْا مُدْبِرِينَ [الروم : 52]
أَفَأَنتَ تُسْمِعُ الصُّمَّ أَوْ تَهْدِي الْعُمْيَ وَمَن كَانَ فِي ضَلَالٍ مُّبِينٍ [الزخرف : 40]
أُوْلَئِكَ الَّذِينَ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ فَأَصَمَّهُمْ وَأَعْمَى أَبْصَارَهُمْ [محمد : 23]

اّيات ذكر عدم السمع
وَمَثَلُ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُواْ كَمَثَلِ الَّذِي يَنْعِقُ بِمَا لاَ يَسْمَعُ إِلاَّ دُعَاء وَنِدَاء صُمٌّ بُكْمٌ عُمْيٌ فَهُمْ لاَ يَعْقِلُونَ [البقرة : 171]
أَوَلَمْ يَهْدِ لِلَّذِينَ يَرِثُونَ الأَرْضَ مِن بَعْدِ أَهْلِهَا أَن لَّوْ نَشَاء أَصَبْنَاهُم بِذُنُوبِهِمْ وَنَطْبَعُ عَلَى قُلُوبِهِمْ فَهُمْ لاَ يَسْمَعُونَ [الأعراف : 100]
وَلَقَدْ ذَرَأْنَا لِجَهَنَّمَ كَثِيراً مِّنَ الْجِنِّ وَالإِنسِ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌ لاَّ يَفْقَهُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ أَعْيُنٌ لاَّ يُبْصِرُونَ بِهَا وَلَهُمْ آذَانٌ لاَّ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا أُوْلَـئِكَ كَالأَنْعَامِ بَلْ هُمْ أَضَلُّ أُوْلَـئِكَ هُمُ الْغَافِلُونَ [الأعراف : 179]
وَإِن تَدْعُوهُمْ إِلَى الْهُدَى لاَ يَسْمَعُواْ وَتَرَاهُمْ يَنظُرُونَ إِلَيْكَ وَهُمْ لاَ يُبْصِرُونَ [الأعراف : 198]
وَلاَ تَكُونُواْ كَالَّذِينَ قَالُوا سَمِعْنَا وَهُمْ لاَ يَسْمَعُونَ [الأنفال : 21]
إِذْ قَالَ لِأَبِيهِ يَا أَبَتِ لِمَ تَعْبُدُ مَا لَا يَسْمَعُ وَلَا يُبْصِرُ وَلَا يُغْنِي عَنكَ شَيْئاً [مريم : 42]
لَا يَسْمَعُونَ فِيهَا لَغْواً إِلَّا سَلَاماً وَلَهُمْ رِزْقُهُمْ فِيهَا بُكْرَةً وَعَشِيّاً [مريم : 62]
لَهُمْ فِيهَا زَفِيرٌ وَهُمْ فِيهَا لَا يَسْمَعُونَ [الأنبياء : 100]
لَا يَسْمَعُونَ حَسِيسَهَا وَهُمْ فِي مَا اشْتَهَتْ أَنفُسُهُمْ خَالِدُونَ [الأنبياء : 102]
أَوَلَمْ يَهْدِ لَهُمْ كَمْ أَهْلَكْنَا مِن قَبْلِهِم مِّنَ الْقُرُونِ يَمْشُونَ فِي مَسَاكِنِهِمْ إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لَآيَاتٍ أَفَلَا يَسْمَعُونَ [السجدة : 26]
إِن تَدْعُوهُمْ لَا يَسْمَعُوا دُعَاءكُمْ وَلَوْ سَمِعُوا مَا اسْتَجَابُوا لَكُمْ وَيَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ يَكْفُرُونَ بِشِرْكِكُمْ وَلَا يُنَبِّئُكَ مِثْلُ خَبِيرٍ [فاطر : 14]
لَا يَسَّمَّعُونَ إِلَى الْمَلَإِ الْأَعْلَى وَيُقْذَفُونَ مِن كُلِّ جَانِبٍ [الصافات : 8]
بَشِيراً وَنَذِيراً فَأَعْرَضَ أَكْثَرُهُمْ فَهُمْ لَا يَسْمَعُونَ [فصلت : 4]
لَا يَسْمَعُونَ فِيهَا لَغْواً وَلَا تَأْثِيماً [الواقعة : 25]
لَّا يَسْمَعُونَ فِيهَا لَغْواً وَلَا كِذَّاباً [النبأ : 35]

يَوْمَئِذٍ يَتَّبِعُونَ الدَّاعِيَ لَا عِوَجَ لَهُ وَخَشَعَت الْأَصْوَاتُ لِلرَّحْمَنِ فَلَا تَسْمَعُ إِلَّا هَمْساً [طه : 108]
قُلْ أَرَأَيْتُمْ إِن جَعَلَ اللَّهُ عَلَيْكُمُ اللَّيْلَ سَرْمَداً إِلَى يَوْمِ الْقِيَامَةِ مَنْ إِلَهٌ غَيْرُ اللَّهِ يَأْتِيكُم بِضِيَاء أَفَلَا تَسْمَعُونَ [القصص : 71]
وَقَالَ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا لَا تَسْمَعُوا لِهَذَا الْقُرْآنِ وَالْغَوْا فِيهِ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَغْلِبُونَ [فصلت : 26]
لَّا تَسْمَعُ فِيهَا لَاغِيَةً [الغاشية : 11]

فرض حل

وجعل لكم السمع والأبصار والأفئدة

افتراض حل لإفراد السمع

الكلام للمجموع أي الناس, والسمع للتواصل فسمع واحد لتواصل واحد بين الناس
على عكس الأبصار والأفئدة فهم خاصة كل فرد من المجموع

Locus coeruleus

Sensation/feeling coupling season 3

Attention & perception season..

Phase I:
perception:is the understanding of the input.
understanding is the ability to interact with the input
interaction is motor intellectual action.
Thwe whole brain systems will be involved in a single input perception

Results:
1)perception is not confined to certain locus at brain even the sensory cortex with its association areas.
2) perception, consciousness etc. is not materially existing..only virtually..because perception is being ready to interact & this is achieved simply without requirments of a more complex idea involving what is called consciousness
-----
-essential processes of perception are:
maintenance of attention
the selective focusing on a stimulus
elemination of an extraneous stimuli
identification of the stimulus by recognizing its relationship to personal remembered experience
---
-attention:
the frontal and perhaps the parietal lobes are responsible for directing its content,
but that the thalamocortical system is in a special way responsible
for its maintenance.

THE SELF

One treats the world in a two large equal divisions...... Self...& non-self.
Your eyeballs are the borderline

The "Self" is not in its worthy place comparable to its domination & superiority in human life, maybe because of socialism.
The self as an instinct plays all the game..nearly alone.

Back with the issue to its origination.
Vitality " in my definition"..is to have instincts.
Man & bacteria have the same instincts..search two aspects
1)retaining the individual "i.e keeping him alive"
2)retaining the species
The later one (no.2) is conserved in the bisexual organisms in the term "sex"
The former (no.1) is our issue here.
"retaining the individual" will be termed "self" in the rest of the article.

At the bacterial level..
The salts gradient it makes by its cell membrane, the nutrition, the elimination of the waste products are its "self" instincts, while binary fission..is its other instinct.

With the increasing experience & complexity of the organism..
most of the vital functions that needs interactions with external environment are collected in a single system called the nervous system.
The essence of the vitality of the organism as a whole is retained by this nervous system.
Most vital functions are medicated by this system,both; the
"Self" instincts:
Eating is the nutrition..is mediated by this system.
escaping a huge frightening object is mediated by this system
respiration, blood flow to the body is mediated by this system
& species retaining instinct:
which is developed to the term "sex" instinct very early by the transformation to bisexuality organisms.

Further more evolution
Human being have so mysterious frontal lobe different from other frontal lobes of animal's brain
This lead to very extensive complexity and variability of the interaction with environment as seen from human civilization.
This is what we call intellect & cognition

What is strange & in some way refused to be accepted is that intellect is still influenced by instincts.
How to capture the events mediated instinctively at intellectual level?
The key answer lies in the rivalry behaviour

Getting money is a "self" instinct
Jealousy is a "self" instinct
hope is a self instinct
feeding yourself, talking about yourself, humiliation refusal all are self instincts

Moreover, Rivalry behaviour towards parents, brothers & sisters exist & they are important factors in developmental psychology.
Studying because people study at school, dressing well, good hand writing, doing what people do, tidy homes, earning money, & most of social behaviours are all self instinct mediated.

many many examples are available.."ASK me explanation for any one listed above"


PS:
two important critical issues:
1)when you feel jealousy or in rivalry action toward someone, & this makes you sad because your morals does not permit that..e.g he is your brother or maybe even your father
first do not worry because it is instinctual & normally exists in all of us.
second..deal the one you feel jealous from him as a self
example:
you got lesser score in your exams than your very friend and you are sad & jealous from that.
Treat the non-self(your friend) as a self(you),
for example by saying yourself:
"my friend is mine..is MY friend , he must be with good score be cause he is related to ME..me & him are

2)Playing on the "self" in human communication & directing the communicator with you towards achieve your goals by eliciting rivalry action to make this goal...is really really a non blockable non resistible weapon.



Locus Coerolues

الشيطان والنفس

Very primitively,

The devil is a distractor..shifts Aura from one thing to another.
The self is a thought derived from instinctual motive.

The devil is not a potentiator..he is a switch...َ
َوَمَا كَانَ لِيَ عَلَيْكُم مِّن سُلْطَانٍ إِلاَّ أَن دَعَوْتُكُمْ فَاسْتَجَبْتُمْ لِي فَلاَ تَلُومُونِي وَلُومُواْ َنفُسَكُمم

-------

(Sustained Attention to Response Task) "is to be addressed the next edit isA...



TBC.

---------------------------------
Edit#1:

Database about statistics of sustained attention is not easy to get online...more than a week for searching resulted in nill data.
-----------------------------------
Edit#2:
compiling information:
-essential processes of perception are:
maintenance of attention
the selective focusing on a stimulus
elemination of an extraneous stimuli
identification of the stimulus by recognizing its relationship to personal remembered experience
-attention:
the frontal and perhaps the parietal lobes are responsible for directing its content,
but that the thalamocortical system is in a special way responsible
for its maintenance.

تابع السمع والأبصار و الأفئدة

قُلْ أَرَأَيْتُمْ إِنْ أَخَذَ اللّهُ سَمْعَكُمْ وَأَبْصَارَكُمْ وَخَتَمَ عَلَى قُلُوبِكُم مَّنْ إِلَـهٌ غَيْرُ اللّهِ يَأْتِيكُم بِهِ انظُرْ كَيْفَ نُصَرِّفُ الآيَاتِ ثُمَّ هُمْ يَصْدِفُونَ [الأنعام:46[

---------------------------------------------

Again as mentioned before...most of Qura'nic verses when talking about vision it comes in plural "visions" not vision.

Here in this verse..talking to people as if they have one common hearing "سمعكم", & more than one vision "أبصاركم", also the hearts on plural.

This requires a probability of the following:

1)People as folk achieves the "more than one vision" by their aggregation togeather.
2)every single vision is more than one type of vision.
3)everyone has his own vision & heart..each uniquely for him & different from other one.

-The first is opposed by :
أَفَرَأَيْتَ مَنِ اتَّخَذَ إِلَهَهُ هَوَاهُ وَأَضَلَّهُ اللَّهُ عَلَى عِلْمٍ وَخَتَمَ عَلَى سَمْعِهِ وَقَلْبِهِ وَجَعَلَ عَلَى بَصَرِهِ غِشَاوَةً فَمَن يَهْدِيهِ مِن بَعْدِ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا تَذَكَّرُونَ [الجاثية : 23]
In single person case: the Qura'an mentioned a single vision.

-The secound is a probability indeed, because color perception is different from depth perception or movement perception..
but it comes the question that "hearing" is mentioned as a single one & may have some variabilities like the above too..but this is not so true because hearing sense is not that complex as the vision one.
Also this is opposed by the verse in the first probability disscusion.

-The third is so so strange..it came to my mind while I was learning the "colour blindness" in prep school.
suppose i see the three basic colours "red, green, & blue" as "X, y, & z"..
Suppose another person sees the three colours clearly but sees them as "z, x, & y"..
when we both were young we learned that one input is called "red" but each one sees this input different from each other; I see it "x" & he sees it "z".
Why not????
I have no opposal to this assumption except we all have same cells with same function..but this does not cancel the probability as visual cortex differ in distribution from one person to another completely "mapping of inputs is different".

ps: the verse opposing the first & secound probability if interpreted in different way..then everything will be collapsed & we will start probabilities from the begining


Locus-coeroleus

The principle of the brain..

The following is not an explanation for non professionals of how brain or mind works..It is just a thought developing blogging whith my own viewpoints that may or may not be true.

THE BRAIN
MECHANISM

-Nervous system is made for interaction with environment to attain better existence.
-A prone animal which moves forwards the most part in his body came to interaction first is his front..& thats why it is supposed that nervous system centre in the body is in the head.
-Again the whole issue about brains minds is only for attaining better interaction for better existence.

Brain is subdivided according to McLean's classification into three parts.
1)reptilian brain:Part that keeps the organism alive
2)paleo mammalian: "old mammalian" it is called also the limbic system;which is responsible for emotions & learning.
3)neo mammalian:"new mammalian" it is the grey cortex in our brains..It is a huge store for information & it is so complex.It has areas for motor"movement actions", sensory perception,behavior & some other aspects.

Every organism called living on this planet"from the protozoa until us" must achieves two important principles..

1)self retaining
2)self multiplying
-Missing one of these two principles demolishes this organism either singularly if the first is missing or generally if the second is missing.
-We express these two principles as instincts, self retaining instinct maybe subdivided into sub-instincts, & the self multiplier is the sex.

SO..
When man interacts with the environment he faces..he is motivated basically achieving these two principles.

The experience he gains from the interaction with the environment runs as follows:

-The neo mammalian brain is linked to the paleo mammalian brain "back to mcLean's classification".
-Sensory input is transmitted from receptors"the eye for example" to the sensory cortex "neo mammalian"
-Sensory cortex is linked to the emotion & learning system "paleo mammalian" to make a certain feeling towards the perceived thing from the environment.
-Memorizing the information about the sensation is done in combination between the emotional system & the memory store.
-The memorized item is linked to its feeling or emotion for further recalling.

TBC.

Sensation/feeling coupling season II

PHASE V
---------
1-9-2006
Mclean's 3 brains
reptalian: the operating system
paleomamalian: limbic system
neomamalian: neocortex

-The point that every single sensory input is stored as it is "like what pc do to an image" is so so consuming & requires lots of neurons..
-The coding system in brain seems to be less consuming
-proposal I:
*evry multiple sensations graped together to be a single information called feeling.
*every single feeling is linked to the sensory fields made it.
*Similar sensations may facilitate the feeling..& recalling the feeling
*there is a problem in sensation elicit feeling & feeling facilitate the sensory fields at its cotex..the nerve cell is one way signal transmitter..this requires a circuit for this proposal to be true.
*************************************************
PHASE VI:
------------
"cortical implications"

-sesory cortex has the ability to retain the input in a certain way
MAYBE
-linking the inputing mode to the limbic system in a way that when this input enters this emotion elicited.
-facilitation of an emotion may feed back to the sensory cortex eliciting it.
-this faces also the problem in the phase above that neurons is a one way connectiong system & this requires a neuronal cuircuit.

US..

السمع و الأبصار والأفئدة

Thats how the Holy quraan says it...for always...

i have no stablized thoughts about it.....yet.


but just letting you know this observation.

1) always "al sam3" before "al absar " & "al 2af2eda"

2) always always "al absar" in the plural form & also "al 2af2eda"

Just remember...it is not an incidence....think about it

View points...!!

Only one thing in this universe you must be seeing it in a way & the whole world see it in another different way.... YOU.

Locus Coerulius

Sensation\feeling coupling,absence & consequent thoughts "underconstruction"

UNDERCONSTRUCTION
"participation welcomed..explanations available
................................

PHASE I
-Difference between consciousness & awareness is the difference between sensation & feeling
-Feeling is awareness
-I can not make a born blinded person knows what is the red colour.
-Alien X can not make me make know what is y sensation which enables him to know the state of materials "state is something other than solid liquid or gas..it is something like emotions "but not emotions at all it is different" this something he can not make me know its nature as i can not make the blind person knows what is red".

SO:
-Feeling is knowing
-Feeling is the lowest level, no sub-level can be reached."neither me or the blind got the point"
-Communication is based upon inter-conductance of the lowest level "states" between communicators.
-No communication can be based upon a type of low level naturally deficient at one of the communicators."neither me or the blind became aware of the feeling"
-Communication tools symbolize the desired low level "state" desired to be communicated.
=proposals:
Communication is feeling without sensation. "roughly: imagination"virtualization,(10-4)dairies" of the sensation"
Mental process is self communication..self lowest grade "state" conductance or induction.
Self communication is communication between the person just before this moment"all previous experience" & a "blank mind" person.

to be continued....
self message:back to 10-4 & attached paper if possible
****************************************************
PHASE II
(10-4) page : long & short loop reflexes "basicly motivated" from reward & punishment system.

proposals II :
-Every single input "simple or complex"combined sensations making a single meaning" is "A Feeling....".
-Feeling is the currency unit in mind.
-Different sensory modalities are not the unit of input they are receptors & displayers for the unit. "old news"
-(1+1 = 2) it is a logical process...
knowing of the symbols "1 ,+ , = & 2" :perception of a symbol with its representational "Feeling" (meaning) in mind.
Logics are : Feeling of agreed about "simple(single) representing" symbols for a certain brain process , whether the process is meaning(1) or a mental process(+).
Non logics are : non perfectly agreed about symbols "change according to non constant affector",whether a meaning or a proces..which may lead to non equal output feeling.
affector mentioned in statment above: is an item in the symbolizing which is not universally equal for same interactors"persons"...roughly terming"emotion to the symbol.


To be continued.....
mama betza3a2 :D:D:D

*********************
PHASE II completion :

AFFECTOR :A factor that unstabilize the input symbolization whether from the interactor or from the symbol.
-symbol in non-logic must contain the affector plus or minus a stable part of the symbole.
-Affectors: "roughly concluded until now"
Physical "brain" mistake.
What is collectively called emotion <<<not well settled thoughting..but roughly....

end phase II

To be cont.

************************************************
PHASE III
-Aura..is focusing at one state of feeling whether interactive(external)" which is either single sensory mediated or multiple sensory medaited" or intellectual(internal).
-Interactive feeling "with external environment" is either :
single sensory mediated...."red color"
multiple sensory mediated..."wood piece...shape, color, expected texture ,expected etc. "

-Intellectual feeling "internal environment like inner speech" has no external sensory input..we may assume that it has internal sensory input.

From PHASE I..to generalize more the communication..

communication is the brain inputing system devided into three parts "primitively"

1)External communication :mediated through the different sensory inputs (expressing a feeling resembling the nature of the input) from the external environment inputing the aura.

This is the earliest & first brain communication in human.

2)Internal communication : This is the intellectual feeling originated from brain inputing the aura.

3)External-internal : human communication is the most prominent example.

This type of communication expressing an internal feeling elicited by an external input symbolizing the internal meaning in a way.

(The word wood..is not wood in nature but elicit a certain feeling "the wood")

**********************************************************

PHASE IV :

Memory implications:

-Memory is for feelings.

-Seems there are no memory for only sensation.

-Feeling seems linked yo sensation in a way in the conception "memory"

either a tag or just association "Allahu 2a3lam"

-Also..seems there is memory for processes...but in this case it lis linked to feelings not sensation.

-Processes are feeling expected to be a consequent for a certain feeling..we can say there is a facilitation in some feelings in emergence of another related to eachother.

-So seems there is no descrete thing called process...it is an facilitated feeling in response to a feeling

Numercality..numbers & duality principle

(0)....non existability "the nothing"

(1)....Existability..self integration

(2)....numericality...non-self integration

.........................................


The duality principle:

-It is a system composed of two members participating in making a common principle achived by the presence of both.
-Every member in dual system...is not cabable of fulfilling the essence of the dual system "to which he participates at" alone.
-Canceling of a member of a dual system "in the presence of the other one" does not cancel the existance of the present member but deletes its subjective in the system & deletes the system itself as well.
-So, every member needs the other member to gain its own subjective.

Example :
Charges...:
there are two charges "positive & negative"
-Forming a duality system called the essence "charge"
-Suppose that there is only positive & no negative..,we would totally will not be aware of an essence called charge as charges is attracted & attractor what & we lost one..then the essence of establishing this property would not be pressent.
-Suppose that there is positive charge only too, what would motivate me to call it positive then..i no nothing called charges in origin!!..
=what is positive?
-a charge?
=what is charge?
-huh.
-Both positive & negative charges need each other to gain its own subject..non-self integration..moreover both are required to attain the essence "charges" ;the dual system made by them.


N.B
this explains the numbers representations above...(2) non-self integration...need somone to attain your integration...
& also explains the self integration at (1)

parallelism & convergence...

did you ask yourself before
why do not i see angels???
where are the devils...???
or where exactly is theology??

to approximate the view...

look at your shoulders if you didn't see angels then you have the following possibilities..
1)they do not exist
2)they exist

We are belivers so we choose the secound...so you have the following possibilities..
1)there is a way to localize & determine them...with a certain philosophy, vision or technology aside from that there certain things are reachable or not..

2)there is no way ever ever to localize them...they are of different universe with different universal components we can not be aware of...,i.e we are humans made of atoms we can localize anything made of these atoms but nothing more..they are angels made of X that we can not be aware of.
Note that this is applied on technology tools too

The first possibility is convergence between materials(represented by science) & non materials(represented by religion)"i.e what world terms it theology"

In the secound there is no convergence or points of meeting between the two systems i.e materials "science" & non materials"religion metaphysics" ,& this is what is called parallelism

Only one of these two choices are the right...for sure...but which one???
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OBSERVATIONS :

evolution....every change happens by the affection of evolution specially number of species membershuman being number,...200 years ago..people used to have lots of people 20 oir maybe more...while now...more than 3 commonly...is too much..where is the nature that affected that cavernous reduction in number of pffspring..?????it was a change in culture & social habits...has no relation to nature..in fact to be honest it is related to some choice...a human choice...a mind choose between both it was not the nature that chose that....while in omnkeys it stayed as it is...for that 200 years.....this is a point for human choice based principle aka spirtuality & religion


The uncertainity principle...:einstien said about theat principle "God does not play dice with the world"the principle says that for an electron "for example" if indicated well its wave phase....there is no possibility for predicting its place..as there are more than place the electron can be located at...but the fact that all possibilities collapse in the end at one place which is the one that electron takes...but the problem is that there is no reason for choosing a place other than the others...& thats why einstien's said the above words.& spent most of his last researches in a wrong direction because of not taking in consideration that uncertainity is a true principlethis is a hole in the material stalk...& by some philosophy & little further knowldge it can lead to enterance of any thing to link it to the matter...even spirtuality or metaphysics..


embryos born everyday embryology describes every day of development & it is purely material of nothing extra ordinary or ectopic & this cancels the probability to reach spiruals by science & matte analysis & parallelism cruically describes that.


the headphone infront of me...made of plasticplastic is made of polymers of carbon chaincarbon is made of electrons protons & neutronselectrons etc. fored of quarks & leptonswhat else...:Sso science explores the existables & does not explores & searches existance & science didn't ever asked himself from where that energy came & why it is E= mc^2 & not ^3thas a point for the convergence of both views, as science only analyze the existables & so spirtuals is not in opposing to matterials & parallelism condition collapses.


when we ask from God something & he makes it for us...he made it & He is the one who made it we belive in that...but if the thing was for example "successing in an exam"...it will include the teacher who marks the paper read answers in a way & i wrote the answer in a way...that logically will lead to success with or without asking...but we belive that God made that this case has two sides...material & spirtual side extremly parallel & will never meet.


many observations exists...i only viewed a sample

PS :

Western civilization decided as early as the start of renaissance 14th century to ignore this dilemma & treated the case as there is nothing in real called theology & announced that if there is a paradise it will be on earth. And since there they went forward to progress in science & arts with no obstacles..

WE until now, didn't determine how we are going to deal this dilemma...
we still in argument about Darwin & Fruid....
we belive in our religion very well & do not want to withdraw
we belive in science too very well...but..sometimes they oppose eachother..& there exactly we are situated.
choices avilable for us :
1)To ignore theology like western "west assumes that middle east ignorance & drawbacks are due to "not letting theology go away"...some very few people here chose that ..we term them usually "eil-maney-yen"

2) to still in our argument & situation.."Darwin ebn kaddabah or ebn kafrah" & forever...there are many of them nowadays :D

3) we go to search & determine which on of "parallism or convergence" is the truth..& proceed forward in science & development dogma but with our religion & believes not like the western civilization.
at least one is on this track...a.k.a "me" this is my aim & vision & i try making steps by God's support isA.

this is a post related to the situation
http://aymanelgendy.blogspot.com/2006/04/blog-post_21.html


Locus Cerulius..

existance instinct...???

Human lives because he has no problem with that...

& escapes dying because it is unpleasent initiating fear in him.

If you have a mind...if you have an aim if you have a dream...thats not the reason that makes you desire to live...isn't it???


Human lives because he knows nothing to do except this...& death is just a scary idea just like dinasours, he just escapes this..prgrammed to do so.

"Human alive system" is prgrammed to autoretain itself.

definition :Instinct.., is something inherited by a living that serves primarily to support his existance on individual & species levels.


Hence,to be clearer in terming...not to call it "existance instinct"...but to call it..."Fear instinct" with the asidance of the stimulator to this instinct..

Locus cerulius

Big-bang determinism..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_bang


"Thinking and writing these words..,your reading to that...,&everything before & after this event...;is an obligatory results from the Big-bang"

A very very big enormous one chemical equation...that must give all what happens in the universe

Thats the current philiosophy gained from the science...DETERMINISM

Hence it cancels the what we agreed about terming it.."CHOICE"
Everything done & will be done..is just a result from that archaic universal explosion...& can be claculated & estimated..but by a very very very complex calculations that includes all particles in the universe.

Another Hence,
It cancels any human Choice principled system aka religion.

This theory currently has no holes except
-one scientific hole called "uncertainity principle" by Hiesenberg,
-and another philosophical religional point...shortly illustrated below,
"Human senses & as a consequence "awarness" is limited to his own material."
Which means..that human will observe only his level of existance...i.e what we call "matter"
Matter works in accurate laws..non breakable except at miracles by messengers sent by the maker of these laws to prove to human that He is the creator of these laws by the clue that He broke it.


one of the previous two holes & only one will be true..
if the uncertainity...,then matter & spirtuals are in a same room i.e spirtuals are scientific facts of undetermined yet mechanism & it is a mtter of time to know it.
& if the philosophy above..then big bang determinism applies on our awarness level..

ps: something of no direct answer by religional or scientifical systems..is the origion...
if big bang "who made the big bang..in further step..who made the atom..who made the electrons,neutrons & protons....who made the quarks & leptons"
in religion the prohpet's Hadit "ya'tey al shaytano le ahadekom fayakol man khalaka haza wa man khalaka haza..."

but in common there is an answer...a logical one..& supports the religional side..which follows..:
"who made the atoms....then who made what made the atoms...then who made that who mades what who mades the atoms etc. to INFINITY
infinity has no single existance...like when i ask you what is the last number in the numbers????there is no existance for it...
So,there is no existance for such infinity chain..& it must has a finate origin & an end to this..
Religion says the end is Allah..,science has no current answer or even tries for that."
the later proof is concluded by "al 3abd lelah...then found the same conclusion from an old religion scientest"


Locus cerolius

The Choice...

CNS : central nervous system,
works in the living in the same way the microprocessors do.
Input==>processing==>output

Input in CNS is the environment "sensation"
output "assumed it is the motor actions of the organism"
processing is what is done to achieve best response to environmental inputs...

Current view is :
sensation "input" & motor functions "output"

Further step in this viewpoint concerning man...
All what concerns man interaction with environment are reflexes..
Even THOUGHTS ,emotions etc. are obligatory output from the environmental input.

Human choice & mind system melts down & smashed against that wall...you have no choice..it is reflexes you have nothing to handle it..even these words are reflexes..even your reading to these words are reflexes.
Worth mentioning that according to that, any choice based principles will collapse with it...including the major one of those .."religion"
----------------------------
The holy Quraan mentions something strange about the input output system (I/O SYS) of human being..:
"والله أخرجكم من بطون امهاتكم لا تعلمون شيئا وجعل لكم السمع والأبصار و الأفئدة لعلكم تشكرون"
means: And Allah got you out of your mother's abdomen knowing nothing, and made for you the audition, the visions & the hearts in order you may thank Him.
"أفلم يسيروا في الأرض فتكون لهم قلوب قلوب يفقهون بها أو اذان يسمعون بها فإنها لا تعمى الأبصار ولكن تعمى القلوب التي قي الصدور"
means:Didn't they walk on earth & so they gain hearts know by it or ears hear by it,..it is not vision blindness they have, but blindness in their hearts that inside chests.

The holy Quraan as shown above..adds something called the heart "seems the mind in our talk" to the I/O system.
wether an input or output..it is not clear now for me..but it is not only..
In the 1st verse..God gives us the tools in order to know after the "null contained minds" we used to have when we were born..,
the tools are two of the input system & the heart(mind)


TBC.

Sporing..

If we consider bacteriaas a living...& we realy do,
then is it a living in the sporing form...???? http://www.answers.com/sporing&r=67

if yes :
then to which things exactly we refer te term vital or alive to??
to moelcules?
Let us consider the sporing form as a perfect man...who does need food or sex..but he do exists
He do not need even respiration..
but exists,..Is he alive then???

if no :
then how it is re-sent alive again when conditions become suitable???
Is it a must on the vital laws that death walks in forward & only forward direction??
bacteria dies as well..but is that a kind of dying??
which things exactly we refer dying too?
If we corrupt the sporing form composition in a way..it can not be re-sent active again...i.e spore dead..or bacteria dead.

conclusion
one of three possibilities
1) sporing is a living form
2) bacteria dead & resent alive again
3) bacteria is not a living

cases 1 & 3 lead to re-defining the term alive & its whole philosophy
case 2 death has some options "at least in lower creatures" differ from our current philosopy


Locus cerolius

Intro

Thinking...is another type of sensation
observables...are pure emotions only
Truth...is belif

"whole dogmae collapse"

but remains the sole pioneer one..

He is one..
He is the one