The devil is a distractor..shifts Aura from one thing to another.
The self is a thought derived from instinctual motive.
The devil is not a potentiator..he is a switch...َ
َوَمَا كَانَ لِيَ عَلَيْكُم مِّن سُلْطَانٍ إِلاَّ أَن دَعَوْتُكُمْ فَاسْتَجَبْتُمْ لِي فَلاَ تَلُومُونِي وَلُومُواْ َنفُسَكُمم
(Sustained Attention to Response Task) "is to be addressed the next edit isA...
Database about statistics of sustained attention is not easy to get online...more than a week for searching resulted in nill data.
-essential processes of perception are:
maintenance of attention
the selective focusing on a stimulus
elemination of an extraneous stimuli
identification of the stimulus by recognizing its relationship to personal remembered experience
the frontal and perhaps the parietal lobes are responsible for directing its content,
but that the thalamocortical system is in a special way responsible
for its maintenance.
Again as mentioned before...most of Qura'nic verses when talking about vision it comes in plural "visions" not vision.
Here in this verse..talking to people as if they have one common hearing "سمعكم", & more than one vision "أبصاركم", also the hearts on plural.
This requires a probability of the following:
1)People as folk achieves the "more than one vision" by their aggregation togeather.
2)every single vision is more than one type of vision.
3)everyone has his own vision & heart..each uniquely for him & different from other one.
-The first is opposed by :
أَفَرَأَيْتَ مَنِ اتَّخَذَ إِلَهَهُ هَوَاهُ وَأَضَلَّهُ اللَّهُ عَلَى عِلْمٍ وَخَتَمَ عَلَى سَمْعِهِ وَقَلْبِهِ وَجَعَلَ عَلَى بَصَرِهِ غِشَاوَةً فَمَن يَهْدِيهِ مِن بَعْدِ اللَّهِ أَفَلَا تَذَكَّرُونَ [الجاثية : 23]
In single person case: the Qura'an mentioned a single vision.
-The secound is a probability indeed, because color perception is different from depth perception or movement perception..
but it comes the question that "hearing" is mentioned as a single one & may have some variabilities like the above too..but this is not so true because hearing sense is not that complex as the vision one.
Also this is opposed by the verse in the first probability disscusion.
-The third is so so strange..it came to my mind while I was learning the "colour blindness" in prep school.
suppose i see the three basic colours "red, green, & blue" as "X, y, & z"..
Suppose another person sees the three colours clearly but sees them as "z, x, & y"..
when we both were young we learned that one input is called "red" but each one sees this input different from each other; I see it "x" & he sees it "z".
I have no opposal to this assumption except we all have same cells with same function..but this does not cancel the probability as visual cortex differ in distribution from one person to another completely "mapping of inputs is different".
ps: the verse opposing the first & secound probability if interpreted in different way..then everything will be collapsed & we will start probabilities from the begining
Labels: السمع والأبصار والأفئدة